Spanish 
English 
Cracked pavement, faded lane markings, and missing warning signs are not just irritating. In California, they pose a significant public safety problem, leading to real crashes, real injuries, and real financial losses. Recent transportation data indicate that a substantial share of California’s major roads are in poor or mediocre condition, resulting in drivers incurring billions of dollars in extra vehicle repairs and operating costs each year.
If you were hurt because a road was not properly maintained, you may have the right to bring a claim against the government agency responsible for that roadway.
This guide from State Law Firm walks you through when you can sue for dangerous road conditions, how the process works, what evidence matters, and why acting quickly is critical.
Understanding the Legal Responsibility for Road Maintenance in California
In California, state and local public entities have a legal duty to keep public property, including roads and highways, in a reasonably safe condition for drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians. That duty typically falls on agencies such as Caltrans, counties, and cities that own or control the roadway.
California law recognizes a specific cause of action called a “dangerous condition of public property.”
In simple terms, a dangerous condition exists when the condition of the road presents a substantial risk of injury to people using it with due care in a reasonably foreseeable way. A single deep pothole in a lane of travel, a missing guardrail on a curve, or a signal timing problem at a busy intersection can all escalate to a dangerous condition if the risk is severe enough.
To hold a public entity liable, an injured person generally has to show:
- The property was in a dangerous condition at the time of the incident.
- That condition proximately caused the injury.
- The dangerous condition created a reasonably foreseeable risk of the kind of injury that occurred.
- The public entity either
- created the dangerous condition through a negligent act or omission, or
- had notice of the condition (actual or constructive) and enough time to fix it or warn about it but failed to do so.
There is a key limitation: a public entity is usually not responsible for property it does not own or control. One of the first tasks in any road maintenance case is confirming which agency was responsible for the stretch of road where your crash occurred.
Common Types of Road Hazards Leading to Injury Claims
Not every imperfect road gives rise to a lawsuit. California courts look for conditions that are more than minor or trivial defects. Some of the recurring hazards that can lead to viable claims include:
- Severe potholes and crumbling pavement
Deep holes, broken asphalt, or large areas of uneven pavement can cause a vehicle to lose control, blow a tire, or eject a cyclist from their bike. - Inadequate or missing signage
Missing stop signs, yield signs, speed limit signs, curve warnings, or “stop ahead” signs that drivers rely on to navigate safely. - Poor striping and lane markings
Faded lane lines, lack of crosswalk markings, or confusing channelization that makes it hard to tell where to drive, turn, or stop. - Dangerous intersections and signal problems
Malfunctioning traffic lights, improper signal timing, or blocked sightlines at intersections that increase crash risk. - Shoulder drop-offs and lack of guardrails
Steep drop-offs at pavement edges, missing guardrails near embankments or bridges, and other roadside hazards that magnify the consequences of a small driving error. - Drainage and standing water issues
Poor drainage that leads to hydroplaning, hidden potholes, or mud and debris on the roadway after storms.
If any of these conditions contributed to your collision, it is essential to document them as soon as possible. Road crews often repair obvious hazards after a serious crash, which can erase crucial evidence.
Your Rights as an Injured Party: When Can You File a Claim?
Suppose a dangerous road condition contributed to your injuries. In that case, you may be able to bring a claim against the public entity that owns or controls the road, and in some cases against private contractors that helped create the hazard.
Your rights generally depend on three key questions:
- Was there a legally “dangerous” condition?
The defect must pose a substantial risk to careful users, not just be mildly annoying or cosmetic. - Did the government create or know about the danger?
If an agency’s own crew created the hazard, liability may exist even without prior complaints. If the danger developed over time, you often must show the agency knew or should have known about it and had a reasonable opportunity to fix it or provide warnings. - Did the dangerous condition actually cause your injuries?
There must be a direct connection between the road defect and what happened to you. For example, if a driver loses control after hitting a large pothole and crashes, the pothole is a clear part of the chain of events.
Because these cases involve public entities, you must comply with strict notice rules before filing a lawsuit. In most California personal injury cases against a government agency, you must file a written government claim within six months of the date of injury. If you miss that deadline, you may lose your right to sue, or at best face an uphill fight to ask the court for permission to proceed late.
Separately, California’s general statute of limitations gives injured people two years from the date of injury to file a lawsuit against non-government defendants. When a public entity is involved, the claim requirement changes how and when that two-year period is applied. An attorney can help you map out the exact timelines for your situation.
The Process of Suing Government Entities for Negligent Road Maintenance
Suing a public entity in California is different from suing a private driver. Here is the general sequence:
- Get medical care and protect your health
Your first priority is prompt, appropriate medical treatment. Your medical records will later help show the extent of your injuries and how the crash changed your life. - Contact an attorney early
A lawyer familiar with dangerous road cases can identify the proper agencies, send preservation letters, and begin investigation before conditions change. - Identify the responsible entity and file a government claim
Your attorney will determine which agency owned or controlled the road, then file a formal government claim within the six-month deadline. The claim typically includes a description of what happened, the location, the nature of the dangerous condition, and the damages you are seeking. - Wait for the entity’s response
The agency usually has a limited time to accept, reject, or ignore your claim. A written rejection triggers a relatively short window to file a lawsuit, often six months from the date of the rejection notice. If the agency does not respond in writing, you may have more time, but you cannot assume. The deadlines are technical and unforgiving. - File a civil lawsuit if necessary
If the claim is denied or not resolved, your lawyer can file a lawsuit in the appropriate California court. The case then proceeds through discovery, expert analysis, negotiations, and potentially trial, just like other civil cases, but with additional defenses and procedural rules that apply to public entities.
Throughout this process, State Law Firm can communicate with the government and its insurers on your behalf, so you can focus on healing instead of paperwork.
Proving Negligence: What Evidence Do You Need?
Winning a road maintenance case requires more than simply saying “the road was bad.” Strong claims are built on careful documentation and expert analysis. Helpful evidence often includes:
- Scene photos and videos
Clear images of the roadway, taken as soon as possible after the incident, showing the hazard from multiple angles and distances. Photos that include a ruler, shoe, or other reference object can help show the size and depth of a defect. - Vehicle and property damage
Photos and repair estimates that show how your car, motorcycle, or bicycle was damaged can help reconstruct how the crash occurred and how the road condition contributed. - Declaraciones de testigos
Statements from passengers, other drivers, nearby residents, or workers who saw the crash or can confirm that the condition existed for a long time before your injury. - Prior complaints and maintenance records
Public records and agency maintenance logs can show whether the government knew about the problem and how it responded. For example, prior reports of the same pothole or intersection may demonstrate notice. - Police reports and traffic collision reports
These documents often include diagrams, measurements, and the investigating officer’s observations about road conditions and contributing factors. - Expert analysis
Engineers, accident reconstructionists, and human factors experts can help explain why a particular design, drainage problem, or missing sign created an unreasonable risk to road users.
Collecting and preserving this evidence early is critical. A law firm experienced in dangerous condition cases knows which agencies to contact, what records to request, and which experts to involve.
Pitfalls and Challenges in Pursuing a Lawsuit Against Public Agencies
Claims against government entities are not easy. Even when the road was plainly dangerous, public entities have powerful defenses, including:
- Design immunity
If a roadway feature was part of an approved design, the public entity may claim immunity from liability for the design itself. However, that does not always shield the agency from liability for failing to warn about a known danger at that location. - Discretionary immunity
Agencies often argue that certain decisions about how to allocate maintenance resources are protected discretionary acts. Your attorney’s task is to distinguish between protected policy choices and negligent failure to carry out established safety standards. - Short deadlines and technical traps
Missing the six-month government claim deadline or failing to include required information can be fatal to a claim. Even seasoned practitioners approach these timelines with caution. - Comparative fault arguments
California follows a pure comparative negligence system, which means the government may argue that your own driving contributed to the crash. Even if that is true, you can often still recover a portion of your damages, but your recovery may be reduced by your percentage of fault.
Because of these hurdles, it is rarely wise to handle a serious road maintenance case against a public agency on your own. A misstep on procedure can matter just as much as the facts of the crash.
The Role of a Personal Injury Attorney in These Cases
A knowledgeable personal injury attorney is not just a spokesperson in court. In dangerous road condition cases, your lawyer is also:
- An investigator who tracks down records, video, and witnesses before they disappear.
- A strategist who understands how to navigate the Government Claims Act and avoid procedural traps.
- A storyteller who can explain to a judge or jury why a patch of pavement, a missing sign, or a poorly timed signal turned an ordinary drive into a life-altering event.
At State Law Firm, we combine that legal work with a practical focus on what our clients need day to day: help managing medical bills, dealing with insurers, and planning for the future. When a public agency fails to maintain safe roads, you should not be left to shoulder the consequences alone.
Protecting Your Rights After an Injury from Poor Road Maintenance in California
Poorly maintained roads are more than a frustration. They reflect choices about funding, priorities, and safety that affect everyone on California’s highways and city streets. When those choices lead to preventable injuries, the law gives you a path to seek accountability and compensation.
If you or someone you love was hurt because of a dangerous road condition, do not wait to learn your options. Strict deadlines apply, and key evidence can change or disappear quickly. Consider speaking with a California personal injury attorney as soon as you can to review your case, preserve your rights, and take the next steps toward recovery.
State Law Firm is here to help you understand whether you have a viable claim, what your case might involve, and how to move forward with confidence.
